Stem cell controversy

From WikiMD's Food, Medicine & Wellness Encyclopedia

Stem Cell Controversy[edit | edit source]

The Stem Cell Controversy is a contentious issue in biomedical research and ethics, revolving around the use of embryonic stem cells in scientific and medical research. This controversy primarily concerns the creation, usage, and destruction of human embryos.

Diagram of an embryonic stem cell

Background[edit | edit source]

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that have the potential to develop into many different types of cells in the body. They serve as a sort of internal repair system, dividing essentially without limit to replenish other cells. When a stem cell divides, each new cell has the potential to either remain a stem cell or become another type of cell with a more specialized function, such as a muscle cell, a red blood cell, or a brain cell.

Controversy[edit | edit source]

The controversy surrounding stem cell research is centered on the source of stem cells. While adult stem cells can be derived from the patient's own body, reducing the risk of rejection, they are limited in the types of cells they can become. Embryonic stem cells, on the other hand, can become any cell type in the body, but they are typically derived from embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) that are then donated for research.

The primary ethical concerns are that obtaining stem cells from an embryo typically involves destroying the embryo, which some equate to taking a human life. This has led to a complex and often polarized international legal landscape that can be difficult to navigate for researchers, clinicians, and patients alike.

Ethical Considerations[edit | edit source]

The ethical considerations in the stem cell controversy are primarily concerned with the moral status of the embryo. Some argue that as the embryo has the potential to develop into a full human being, it should be afforded the same moral status and rights. Others argue that the embryo does not have the same moral status as a human being until it reaches a certain stage of development, and that the potential benefits of stem cell research outweigh the moral cost of destroying embryos.

Legal Landscape[edit | edit source]

The legal landscape surrounding stem cell research varies widely around the world, with some countries allowing embryonic stem cell research and others banning it outright. In the United States, federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has been a contentious issue, with policies fluctuating with changes in administration.

Conclusion[edit | edit source]

The stem cell controversy is a complex issue that touches on many aspects of society, from science and medicine to ethics and law. While the potential benefits of stem cell research are vast, the ethical and moral concerns cannot be ignored. As our understanding of stem cells continues to grow, it is likely that this controversy will continue to evolve.



Wiki.png

Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD


Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.

Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD