File:2-point orientation discrimination (2POD) compared to traditional two-point discrimination (2PD).jpg

From WikiMD's WELLNESSPEDIA

Original file (1,588 × 482 pixels, file size: 143 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Summary[edit]

Summary
Description From Tong et al (2013) doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00579. (A) Performance on a the traditional two-point discrimination (2PD) task. (B) Performance on the two-point orientation discrimination task (2POD). In both cases, the tests were done with a two-interval forced-choice testing procedure. Note that performance on 2PD is well above chance even at zero mm separation, indicating that 2PD is not a valid measure of tactile spatial acuity. By contrast, performance on 2POD falls to chance level (50% correct) as the point separation approaches zero mm, as expected for a valid measure of spatial acuity.
Source Wikimedia Commons file page
Author Conejo23
Permission See original Commons license details.

Licensing[edit]

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.

Under the following conditions:

  • Attribution — appropriate credit must be given.
  • ShareAlike — derivative works must be distributed under the same license.

Official license: CC BY-SA 4.0

License page: CC BY-SA 4.0

Original attribution and file history: Wikimedia Commons

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current03:22, 5 June 2026Thumbnail for version as of 03:22, 5 June 20261,588 × 482 (143 KB)Maintenance script (talk | contribs)== Summary == Importing file

The following 2 pages use this file:

Metadata