Argument

From WikiMD's Food, Medicine & Wellness Encyclopedia

Argument terminology used in logic (en)

Argument refers to a discussion or discourse in which reasons are put forward in support of and against a proposition, conclusion, or statement. It is a fundamental concept in logic, philosophy, rhetoric, and many other disciplines that involve reasoning and debate. An argument consists of one or more premises and a conclusion. The premises are statements that present evidence or reasons, while the conclusion is the statement that the premises are supposed to support or justify.

Structure of an Argument[edit | edit source]

The structure of an argument can be broken down into its basic components:

  • Premises: Statements that are presented as reasons or evidence for accepting the conclusion. They are the foundational beliefs or assertions that are taken to be true for the purpose of the argument.
  • Conclusion: The statement that the premises are intended to support or prove. It is the outcome of the argument that is being argued for.

Arguments can be further classified into different types based on their structure and the nature of the reasoning involved, such as deductive, inductive, and abductive arguments.

Deductive Arguments[edit | edit source]

In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive reasoning leads to a conclusion that is logically certain. A classic example of a deductive argument is the syllogism.

Inductive Arguments[edit | edit source]

Inductive arguments, unlike deductive arguments, do not aim at logical certainty. Instead, they aim at making the conclusion more probable based on the premises. Inductive reasoning involves generalizing from specific instances or making probabilistic predictions about the future.

Abductive Arguments[edit | edit source]

Abductive reasoning, also known as inference to the best explanation, involves choosing the most likely explanation for a set of observations. It is often used in scientific and investigative contexts where a hypothesis is formed based on the available evidence.

Evaluating Arguments[edit | edit source]

The strength of an argument depends on both the truth of its premises and the validity of the reasoning by which the conclusion is derived from the premises. An argument is considered sound if it is both valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and all its premises are true. Critical thinking skills are essential for evaluating the strength and validity of arguments.

Logical Fallacies[edit | edit source]

Arguments can be weakened or undermined by the presence of logical fallacies—errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument. Common logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, appeals to ignorance, and slippery slope arguments, among others.

The Role of Argument in Society[edit | edit source]

Arguments play a crucial role in society by facilitating discourse and decision-making in various fields, including politics, law, science, and everyday life. The ability to construct and evaluate arguments is a key skill in critical thinking, enabling individuals to engage in rational debate, make informed decisions, and solve problems effectively.

Wiki.png

Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD


Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.

Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Admin, Prab R. Tumpati, MD