In re Quinlan

From WikiMD's Food, Medicine & Wellness Encyclopedia

Seal of the Supreme Court of New Jersey.png
KarenAnnQuinlan.jpg

In re Quinlan was a landmark legal case in the United States that had a significant impact on the right to die and end-of-life care decisions. The case involved Karen Ann Quinlan, a young woman who became unconscious after consuming a combination of alcohol and drugs. She entered a persistent vegetative state, and her parents sought to remove her from a ventilator that was keeping her alive.

Background[edit | edit source]

Karen Ann Quinlan was born on March 29, 1954, in Scranton, Pennsylvania. On April 15, 1975, at the age of 21, she collapsed after consuming alcohol and tranquilizers at a party. She was subsequently taken to a hospital where she was placed on a mechanical ventilator to assist her breathing. Despite medical efforts, she did not regain consciousness and was diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state.

Legal Proceedings[edit | edit source]

In 1975, Karen's parents, Joseph and Julia Quinlan, requested that the hospital remove her from the ventilator, arguing that she would not have wanted to live in such a condition. The hospital refused, citing ethical and legal concerns. The Quinlans then took their case to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

On March 31, 1976, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Quinlans, allowing them to remove Karen from the ventilator. The court's decision was based on the right to privacy, which it interpreted as encompassing the right to refuse medical treatment. This case set a precedent for future right-to-die cases and influenced the development of advance directives and living wills.

Aftermath[edit | edit source]

Following the court's decision, Karen Ann Quinlan was removed from the ventilator. However, she continued to live in a persistent vegetative state for nearly a decade, sustained by artificial nutrition and hydration. She passed away on June 11, 1985.

Impact[edit | edit source]

The In re Quinlan case had a profound impact on bioethics, medical law, and end-of-life care in the United States. It highlighted the importance of patient autonomy and the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. The case also led to increased awareness and use of advance directives and living wills.

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]


Wiki.png

Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD


Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.

Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD